<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(2nd attempt)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jim O.,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'm not sure what gear box I have, as
I'm not really familiar with the previous Hacker motors. I do see
some bolt heads on the back of the motor, which would suggest to me that
they run through the motor and into the gear box in the front. At
the front of the gear box, all you see is the bearing with the actual receiving
holes for the motor-mounting screws. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I flew the Impact 4 flights this weekend.
I did this while flying my Aggressor, and breaking in a new OS 140
RX. It was one of the funnest, BEST pattern day's I've ever had.
I flew the E-Impact and immediately liked the power and speed control
(and ease). The Impact itself, didn't jump off the board as a perfectly
trimmed plane, so I knew I had a little work to do. After the first
flight, the concept was DEFINITELY proven, and I quickly deduced that I
need more batteries (first flight was Saturday evening). After this
first flight (with John B. from Surinam watching), we determined the need
to paint the bottom of the wings and canopy. We ran to Lowes and
bought some florescent red/orange to paint the stab and wing tips, and
we also painted the canopy metallic silver. Also determined that
the plane was tail heavy quite a bit. Anyone familiar with the Impact
thread on RCU knows exactly what I'm talking about in regards to the Impact.
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Sunday morning with CG moved forward,
the plane flew better and the small amount of color we put on the plane
definitely made a huge difference. After this second flight, also
determined that the CG was still too far aft, and that the battery needed
to be moved forward (at this point, knife edge needed no mixing), and the
plane was carrying a small amount of aileron trim. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Then, I flew the Aggressor for the first
flight with the OS 140 RX and 17x10 APC. With th 17x10, the OS was
nearly "super-sonic" compared to the Impact, however immediately,
the Aggressor's trimmed status and "locked-on" look/feel was
evident (as anyone who has seen the plane fly in D3 would attest to. Due
to charging time of the E-Impact, I swapped props to the Mez 18x10, adjusted
the throttle curve, and started moving the speed envelope of the Aggressor
down to match the Impact in a couple more flights. My first thought
was that if I had the E-setup in the Aggressor, it would be an unstoppable
machine! (Aggressor weight without fuel is 10 lbs 13 oz).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Time for another flight on the Impact.
I flew through PO5 this time, and started getting used to the E-power
curve, some rates, etc. The forward CG move started to pay off, and
the plane was drawing better lines (but still not like my glow plane, which
is understandable as this was only the third flight on the model). After
this flight, again, decided the CG needed to go MORE forward. Also,
we determined that the right wing tip needed about 14 grams of weight to
laterally balance the model (a step I did not do in the garage, we added
the tip weight at the field).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Back to the Aggressor: I flew
two more flight back to back on the Aggressor, each time improving the
throttle curve to make it easier to match the envelop of the Impact. The
OS ran perfect, and I'm sad that after 5 years of screwing with other engines,
to have not just spent the little bit of extra money and ran the OS all
along. Through each flight (90 degrees, 90% humidity), the OS ran
superb. Inflight throttling was great, you could tell the motor was
not getting hot, and it was making ridiculous vertical power. (by
the way, this was on an OS A5 plug, C.P. 25% pro-pattern, and ES pipe).
The OS runs VERY smooth with a crazy low idle. I'm VERY happy
with how it ran - not a single dead stick through its first 5 flights -
nothing but awesome performance. The locked in (trimmed) status of
the Aggressor, now flying in the slower speed enveloped, had convinced
John that this was still the "ticket" as compared to where the
Impact was after 3 flights.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Back to the E-Impact!!!!!!!!!! For
this flight, the 6000 Pro-Lite T.P. battery was moved as far forward as
possible (just behind motor). This flight showed some incredible
potential. In this CG config., the Impact was driving lines similar
to the Aggressor (up, down, 45's, etc), and rolling VERY well. Also,
the wing tip weight on the right wing made EVERY SINGLE MANEUVER look better.
The wings were much more locked on, the plane rolled better, exited
snaps better, spinned better. This was a great trimming lesson to
me, as the day was getting cross-windy (worse) through out the day as the
ruminants of the tropical storm passed through, however in the worsening
conditions, this was the BEST of the flights.. After this flight,
John immediately was convinced that this was indeed going to be a solid
backup or first plane for the nats. I'm still going to move the receiver
battery forward now though, and probably make a lighter rudder (which wouldn't
hurt things anyway). (hacker controller has 3 degrees timing).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Charging: I alternated by charging
from the car battery, then letting the car idle for the next charge (guess
what - no big deal to do this if necessary). However my limitation
is that I only have one Astro 109 as the second one has not arrived yet.
Thus, instead of 45 minute turnaround times, I was 1.5 hrs between
flights.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Impact: I followed some RCU advice
and started with a CG on the center of the wing tube, without wings on.
This is in serious error. However, the plane will dive mildly
when in inverted flight, and it gives the impression through simple tests
that the CG is correct. With this CG, the plane flys off the tail.
In radius, the tails squats and the plane will fly tail low. After
I was done with it, the plane was following the nose, driving excellent
lines, similar to the Aggressor (still thanking Tony F. for the trimming
help on my Lazulite,which has now gone into all my planes!).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Glow / Electric: In a quick comparison,
a trimmed plane is what you need. Electric power itself will help
with presentation and probably hide some airplane tendencies (if bad),
due to the smaller speed envelope. Although, the power and the plane
are working together, they are still a bit separate. I guess I'm
trying to say that a poorly trimmed plane is going to hurt you no matter
what motor you have in it. I'm guessing purely guessing now though,
that if two identical planes, both completely trimmed, were equipped with
glow and electric, that the E-setup would take the cake as it would allow
more of a "show-casing" of the maneuver set. More to follow.........</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks, welcome questions, comments,
public or private.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jim W.</font>
<br>
<br>