<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>FWIW…I haven’t really seen many comments from folks that
have recently joined the ranks of Pattern…So here is my take…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>I started flying Pattern in 2003. From my viewpoint, the scored L/TO has
made me work on both. Before competing in Pattern, I wouldn’t fly if the
wind was above 10mph. If it was a crosswind, I wouldn’t fly. Since 2003,
my T/O’s are much better. I feel more comfortable with the cross wind and
don’t feel the need to warn the judges about wearing a hard hat when I fly
now…VBG<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>I can say with certainty. If the L/TO were not judged when I was in
Sportsman, I had plenty of other problems to worry about. I worked more on the L/TO
than anything else because it was easier to fix and still had allot of scoring
weight in Sportsman.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>Because of my own experience, I’m a strong believer that it
should be scored through Advanced. Some of the comments I heared when I was
flying at clubs around the country were, “You can always tell a Pattern Pilot
because the L/TO are always close to perfect”. I heard this at almost
every field I flew at while serving in the Navy…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>Perhaps from my military background I’m big on tradition. IMHO,
if there is something that is good and sets you apart from all others, stay
with it…It’s a Tradition…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>Larry Diamond<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>NSRCA 3083<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>AMA 5024<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>----- Original Message -----<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?x-tad-bigger><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span><?/x-tad-bigger></b><?x-tad-bigger>
discussion-request@nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org] <b><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'><?/x-tad-bigger>On Behalf Of </span><?/x-tad-bigger></b><?x-tad-bigger>Keith
Black<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><b><?x-tad-bigger><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span><?/x-tad-bigger></b><?x-tad-bigger>
Monday, June 13, 2005 10:19 AM<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><b><?x-tad-bigger><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span><?/x-tad-bigger></b><?x-tad-bigger>
discussion@nsrca.org<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><b><?x-tad-bigger><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span><?/x-tad-bigger></b><?x-tad-bigger>
Re: Landing Direction<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger> <br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Marguerite,<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Actually,
I don't think you're alone on this issue. The NSRCA poll showed overwhelmingly
that the membership wanted scored t/o and landings as did the public outcry
after the majority's desires were disregarded. Apparently even the contest
board would have voted to keep the old rule but the question was worded in such
a way to confuse two of the contest board members.<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Now
that the new messed up rule has caused so much confusion I think everyone is
getting so fed-up with it that many would rather have nothing at all than what
we have now. To me this has more to do with being sick of all the ridiculous
discussions than a real desire of pattern pilots to not score t/o and landings.<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>I for
one have been paying attention to take-offs and landings this year and find it
a real shame that we don't have those beautiful centered liftoffs and gentle
climb outs. The new guys coming into sportsman will miss out on this discipline.<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Keith<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>----- Original Message -----<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?x-tad-bigger>MargueriteVG@aol.com<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger>
<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?x-tad-bigger>patternrules@earthlink.net<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger>
; <?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?x-tad-bigger>discussion@nsrca.org<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger>
<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Monday, June 13, 2005 8:58 AM<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Re: Landing Direction<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Good
Morning...... oh oh here goes...<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> I
agree it is important to encourage good landings and take and I will add
to your statement... why not all classes with take off and
landing. Yes, for the most part the pilots in the higher classes will ace
the landing. I have seen the higher classes mess up on the landings
(yes and almost hit me while I was in a contest flying)<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Take off and landing perfectly all the time is the goal for any pilot.
This seems to be getting so involved. I know I am out for the most part alone
on this issue and that is fine with me. ITs just that I
would like to see the pattern community respect this issue and set a good
example for all pilots joining on to Precision Aerobatics.<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
A well done take off and a well done landing is certainly part of flying
aerobatic competition in all classes. Its the start ... and it should
be. I was glad to see someone out there was thinking along the same lines
here.<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Marguerite<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>In a
message dated 6/13/2005 8:23:28 AM Eastern Standard Time,
patternrules@earthlink.net writes:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><br>
<?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>> Personally Jerry, I'd like
to see us score landings and take offs for<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Sportsman
and Intermediate. Given the k-factor of their total schedule<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>it's a
meaningful part, and the ability to land well in a high crosswind is<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>something
they'll need to be comfortable with, so it's worth rewarding ann<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>motivating
the practice required to do it well.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></div>
</body>
</html>