<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Interesting you bring this up. I've spoken to first
year intermediate pilots that plan to move to Advanced next year even though
they really would be better off flying another year in Intermediate. Their
reason is that they want a year of practice with the current Advanced sequence
with the inverted exits and pushes to prepare for Masters and feel the 2007
advanced sequences are too easy. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As I stated before, I've flown both of the proposed
Advanced sequences and I thought they were terrific patterns that flow very
well, however, they are easier than the current pattern. I think these excellent
patterns could be easily fixed to include inverted maneuvers and still take
advantage of the majority of the work. However, at this point I think
that's water under the bridge. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Keith Black</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=amad2terry@juno.com href="mailto:amad2terry@juno.com">Terry
Terrenoire</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 27, 2005 6:27
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Nats Judging Rebate-keep
their best SCORE!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>This IS published in advance, and all pilots know it, so there is no
problem, at least there was not in the 7 years I was involved. We certainly do
not need more rules!!!! Especially a national rule that pertains to just one,
4 day event a year!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>While on the subject of rules changes. A while ago I commented on
the "dumbing down" of the Advance pattern, and had just one or two comments.
How many of you Advance fliers think that it is prudent to go from 4 inverted
maneuvers to NONE. How is that possibly going to prepare you for the
difficulty of Masters??? Have any of you even looked at the proposal? How many
of you have flown the 2 proposed schedules?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> Sure would like to hear some comments from other Advance and
Masters pilots, pro or con!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:57 -0500 "Bob Pastorello" <<A
href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</A>> writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As a "non Nats" guy at the present - a thought
- since a Rules cycle submittal is pending, I think that ANY considerations
about "penalties" for not judging had BETTER BE BUILT INTO AMA
rules.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The AMA Sanctions a national event, and I would
bet dollars to donuts that a subsequent protest for zeroed rounds would WIN
- due to the fact that there is NO AMA provision in the rules to cover the
situations you all are describing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'm not taking sides, nor pointing
fingers/blame.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Simply suggesting that NOW is the time to try
and get a rule change to support the propositions of "enforcement".
Could be important.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><BR>Bob Pastorello<BR><A
href="http://www.rcaerobats.net">www.rcaerobats.net</A><BR><A
href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</A></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vanputte@cox.net href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">Ron Van Putte</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:14
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Nats Judging Rebate-keep
their best SCORE!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>On Jul 27, 2005, at 9:48 AM, Gray E Fowler
wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?smaller>Money does not matter, scores do. In the past, was
it not work or lose your best round? THAT keeps people on their toes.<?/smaller> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>That's done now.<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?smaller>I also heard that some people coming to FAI
and Masters did not submit TWO frequencies, creating matrix hassles.
Same here- assign the matrix to make sense and if the person does not
have his alternate frequency as was requested on the NATS entry form
then he simply does not fly that round. The CD needs relief, and the
contestants need the MOST fair matrix that can be
had.<?/smaller><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>No argument here.<BR><BR>Ron Van
Putte<BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><B><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Ron Van Putte
<vanputte@cox.net><?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></B><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>
<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Sent by:
discussion-request@nsrca.org<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>07/27/2005 09:33 AM<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Please respond to<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>discussion@nsrca.org<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>To<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>discussion@nsrca.org<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>cc<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Subject<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Nats Judging Rebate<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>Last week at the
Nats, I had a talk with Nats event director, Dave
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>Guerin about judging
no-shows. On the very first morning, Dave had
at<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>least three no-shows
(F3A pilots who were supposed to judge the Master
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>class). You can
imagine the frustration of trying to reschedule pilots
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>to cover for them, not to
mention the delay in getting the events <?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>started. This was
not an isolated case. It happened over and over
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>during the week.
Some just forgot when they were supposed to judge. <?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>There were even some
who were scheduled to judge on the third day, who
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>decided to leave after two
days and didn't tell anyone.<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>We discussed
having a "$50 judging rebate". It would work like this: <?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>In addition to the
normal entry fees, $50 would be collected. If a
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>pilot showed up to perform
his scheduled judging session, he'd get a <?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>$50 rebate. If a
pilot didn't show up to perform his scheduled judging
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>session, the replacement
judge would get the $50. BTW, the normal
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>stipend for pilots who
perform extra judging sessions is $30.
<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>Comments?<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>Ron
Van
Putte<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>=================================================<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>To
access the email archives for this list, go
to<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>To
be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>and
follow the instructions.<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><BR><TT><?x-tad-smaller>List
members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.<?/x-tad-smaller></TT><BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>