<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Terry,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2> Dave
Lockhart gave some great advice about practice flying the class above to sharpen
you up in your current schedule.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Once you do it you will soon be up here faking it
with the rest of us. You can even fly FAI as long as it doesn't have an "F" in
front of it. (VBG)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Eric.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=amad2terry@juno.com href="mailto:amad2terry@juno.com">Terry
Terrenoire</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:53
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Sequence comments</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I am having trouble finishing in the middle of the pack in Adv, certaily
not ready for Masters, and do not feel that the new schedule will help that
situation. I MAY be able to finish a little better, but it will not give me
confidence in moving to Masters!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:25:22 -0400 "Bill Pritchett" <<A
href="mailto:phelps15@comcast.net">phelps15@comcast.net</A>> writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Terry:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>You aren't stuck with anything. Move up
to Masters. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>(Advanced Sequence Committee
Member)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=amad2terry@juno.com href="mailto:amad2terry@juno.com">Terry
Terrenoire</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 28, 2005 6:08
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Sequence comments</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Get real, Jerry: you know as well as I do that "this is a done deal"!
Look at the flack over TO and Ldg scores. The general membership has
virtually NO say in what goes on. Surveys be damned. And with some
members of the Sequence team justifying the lack of difficulty by pointing
out that "some of the maneuvers have inverted segments in them". We havn't
got a chance! We ARE going to be stuck with a severely dumbed down
sequence for the next 3 years!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:31:45 -0500 "Jerry Stebbins" <<A
href="mailto:JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net">JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net</A>>
writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Kieth, not necessarily. If a bunch of folks
have valid concerns, it makes no sense to not listen to them. If
you are concerned enough to feel that way, get a bunch of people to fly
them and see if they come to the same position, and let your DVP's know
NOW. TheDVP's can suggest changes in response to valid, properly
supported issues, that a bunch of pilots test and agree need to be
fixed. It still could be fixed, but only with faith that the
Sequence Teams understand the issues people have, and then they can do
their best to fix them before it goes to AMA. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The Sequence Teams have done a great
job based on where they were trying to get to. If the majority think
something needs fixen, and they can convince their DVP, it could be
done. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jerry</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=tkeithb@comcast.net href="mailto:tkeithb@comcast.net">Keith
Black</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 27, 2005
7:58 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Nats Judging
Rebate-keep their best SCORE!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Interesting you bring this up. I've
spoken to first year intermediate pilots that plan to move to Advanced
next year even though they really would be better off flying another
year in Intermediate. Their reason is that they want a year of
practice with the current Advanced sequence with the inverted exits
and pushes to prepare for Masters and feel the 2007 advanced sequences
are too easy. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As I stated before, I've flown both of
the proposed Advanced sequences and I thought they were terrific
patterns that flow very well, however, they are easier than the
current pattern. I think these excellent patterns could be easily
fixed to include inverted maneuvers and still take advantage of the
majority of the work. However, at this point I think that's water
under the bridge. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Keith Black</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=amad2terry@juno.com href="mailto:amad2terry@juno.com">Terry
Terrenoire</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 27, 2005
6:27 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Nats Judging
Rebate-keep their best SCORE!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>This IS published in advance, and all pilots know it, so there
is no problem, at least there was not in the 7 years I was involved.
We certainly do not need more rules!!!! Especially a national rule
that pertains to just one, 4 day event a year!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>While on the subject of rules changes. A while ago I
commented on the "dumbing down" of the Advance pattern, and had just
one or two comments. How many of you Advance fliers think that it is
prudent to go from 4 inverted maneuvers to NONE. How is that
possibly going to prepare you for the difficulty of Masters??? Have
any of you even looked at the proposal? How many of you have flown
the 2 proposed schedules?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> Sure would like to hear some comments from other Advance
and Masters pilots, pro or con!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>