<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>I am having trouble finishing in the middle of the pack in Adv, certaily
not ready for Masters, and do not feel that the new schedule will help that
situation. I MAY be able to finish a little better, but it will not give me
confidence in moving to Masters!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:25:22 -0400 "Bill Pritchett" <<A
href="mailto:phelps15@comcast.net">phelps15@comcast.net</A>> writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Terry:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>You aren't stuck with anything. Move up to
Masters. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>(Advanced Sequence Committee Member)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=amad2terry@juno.com href="mailto:amad2terry@juno.com">Terry
Terrenoire</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 28, 2005 6:08
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Sequence comments</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Get real, Jerry: you know as well as I do that "this is a done deal"!
Look at the flack over TO and Ldg scores. The general membership has
virtually NO say in what goes on. Surveys be damned. And with some
members of the Sequence team justifying the lack of difficulty by pointing
out that "some of the maneuvers have inverted segments in them". We havn't
got a chance! We ARE going to be stuck with a severely dumbed down sequence
for the next 3 years!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:31:45 -0500 "Jerry Stebbins" <<A
href="mailto:JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net">JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net</A>>
writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Kieth, not necessarily. If a bunch of folks
have valid concerns, it makes no sense to not listen to them. If you
are concerned enough to feel that way, get a bunch of people to fly them
and see if they come to the same position, and let your DVP's know NOW.
TheDVP's can suggest changes in response to valid, properly supported
issues, that a bunch of pilots test and agree need to be fixed.
It still could be fixed, but only with faith that the Sequence Teams
understand the issues people have, and then they can do their best to
fix them before it goes to AMA. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The Sequence Teams have done a great job
based on where they were trying to get to. If the majority think something
needs fixen, and they can convince their DVP, it could be done.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jerry</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=tkeithb@comcast.net href="mailto:tkeithb@comcast.net">Keith
Black</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 27, 2005 7:58
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Nats Judging
Rebate-keep their best SCORE!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Interesting you bring this up. I've spoken
to first year intermediate pilots that plan to move to Advanced next
year even though they really would be better off flying another year in
Intermediate. Their reason is that they want a year of practice with the
current Advanced sequence with the inverted exits and pushes to prepare
for Masters and feel the 2007 advanced sequences are too easy.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As I stated before, I've flown both of the
proposed Advanced sequences and I thought they were terrific patterns
that flow very well, however, they are easier than the current pattern.
I think these excellent patterns could be easily fixed to include
inverted maneuvers and still take advantage of the majority of the
work. However, at this point I think that's water under the bridge.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Keith Black</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=amad2terry@juno.com href="mailto:amad2terry@juno.com">Terry
Terrenoire</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 27, 2005
6:27 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Nats Judging
Rebate-keep their best SCORE!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>This IS published in advance, and all pilots know it, so there is
no problem, at least there was not in the 7 years I was involved. We
certainly do not need more rules!!!! Especially a national rule that
pertains to just one, 4 day event a year!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>While on the subject of rules changes. A while ago I
commented on the "dumbing down" of the Advance pattern, and had just
one or two comments. How many of you Advance fliers think that it is
prudent to go from 4 inverted maneuvers to NONE. How is that possibly
going to prepare you for the difficulty of Masters??? Have any of you
even looked at the proposal? How many of you have flown the 2 proposed
schedules?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> Sure would like to hear some comments from other Advance
and Masters pilots, pro or con!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>