<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #8000ff; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#8000ff size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 8/3/2005 9:29:14 AM Central Daylight Time,
ehaury@houston.rr.com writes:</DIV>
<DIV>Earl/Gene</DIV>
<DIV>Also what would the raw score results percentages be if K-factor
for these differences were considered? Would this shed additional light on the
results for actual score differences? </DIV>
<DIV>Buddy</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2>Gene<BR><BR>Good info, and pretty reasonable spreads. It would be
interesting to see <BR>like data from the other classes. One might expect
Masters to have the <BR>lowest spread, as they are being judged by the most
experienced fliers (not <BR>necessarily judges).<BR><BR>Earl<BR><BR>-----
Original Message ----- <BR>From: Gene Maurice<BR>To:
discussion@nsrca.org<BR>Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:51 AM<BR>Subject:
RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon<BR><BR><BR>Don,<BR><BR>Here's some
stats to mull over........<BR><BR>I've pulled all of the scores into a
spreadsheet and identified every <BR>instance where the difference between any
of the 3 judges raw scores was <BR>plus or minus more than 2 points, then plus
or minus more than 3 points<BR><BR>Masters Prelims had 38 pilots actually
flying x 21 scored maneuvers <BR>(excluded TO and Land.) = 798 "judging
opportunities" in each of 6 rounds.<BR><BR>Round
1 2
3 <BR>4 5
6<BR>No of 2pt "Spreads"
130
108 208 107 <BR>210
200<BR>% of 798
16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41% <BR>26.32% 25.06%<BR><BR>No of
3pt "Spreads"
34 28
59 24 <BR>49
39<BR>% of 798
4.26% 3.51% 7.39% 3.01%
<BR>6.14% 4.89%<BR><BR>Gene
Maurice<BR>gene.maurice@comcast.net<BR>Plano, TX<BR>AMA 3408, NSRCA
877<BR><BR><BR><BR>From: discussion-request@nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org] On <BR>Behalf Of Don Ramsey<BR>Sent:
Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:02 PM<BR>To: discussion@nsrca.org<BR>Subject: Re:
Performance Judging? Trial Balloon<BR><BR>We have heard from a lot of Advanced
pilots about the judging on that line. <BR>I would like some feed back from
Masters and FAI on the prelims judges. My <BR>very limited survey seems
to indicated that those lines had very good <BR>judging. I had a lot of
5s & 6s and some good scores but overall my scores, <BR>in my opinion,
were spot on. I'm only asking about the prelims.<BR><BR>Don
<BR><BR><BR>=================================================<BR>To access the
email archives for this list, go
to<BR>http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/<BR>To be removed from
this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>and follow the
instructions.<BR><BR>List members email returned for mailbox full will be
removed from the list.<BR><BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>