<HTML style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: MS Sans Serif"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV> Sorry abouit that I was trying to change some Spam filters and have chaged it back.</DIV>
<DIV> Steve patternrules</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=johnferrell@earthlink.net href="mailto:johnferrell@earthlink.net">John Ferrell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To: </B><A title=discussion@nsrca.org href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion</A></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> 9/20/2005 12:21:27 PM </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Roll coupling #2</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I received the following message when I replied All to the list. The associated link does not work. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I believe it would be considerably more polite to just dump them at the received end rather than spam the well meaning responder. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"I apologize for this automatic reply to your email.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I have approved beforehand. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you, I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Click the link below to fill out the request:</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><A href="https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=patternrules@earthlink.net&id=1ehKL91EX3Nl34h0">https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=patternrules@earthlink.net&id=1ehKL91EX3Nl34h0</A></DIV>
<DIV><BR>"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>John Ferrell <BR><A href="http://DixieNC.US">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=johnferrell@earthlink.net href="mailto:johnferrell@earthlink.net">John Ferrell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=patternrules@earthlink.net href="mailto:patternrules@earthlink.net">patternrules@earthlink.net</A> ; <A title=discussion@nsrca.org href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:18 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Roll coupling #2</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Dave Guerin did a lot experimenting with rudder size and shape as well as experimenting with the rudder hinge angle on the Prodigy. None of these made any real noticeable change in the air.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Of course a different airframe might yield different results. The Prodigy was an anhedral wing version of the Prophecy. It flew like the Prophecy but the wing made it strange to look at. I have one ready to install equipment in, but will not likely get there soon...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>John Ferrell <BR><A href="http://DixieNC.US">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=patternrules@earthlink.net href="mailto:patternrules@earthlink.net">Steven Maxwell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:18 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Roll coupling #2</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<P>
<DIV> I ask this question the other day and got a few replies, all dealing with dihedral, with one exception. Seems that there could be and is much more to this. #1 Could the wing be moved up or down instead of dihedral? 2# Couldn't the rudder size and position, sub fin added or reduced? Sense the 2 piece wing offers less possiblities of changing dihedral than the old one piece wing.</DIV>
<DIV> Designers?</DIV>
<DIV> Please reply to all and remove the sender.</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Steven Maxwell</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>