<html><body>
<DIV>More than looks down. The nose is down in a B-52; even in a climb. The B-52 wing has a high angle of attack, it is a design feature to help the wing generate enough lift at gross weight. When the B-52 was designed the knowledge base on how to design a wing of that huge size for the planned gross weight and speed was small. My guess is Boeing had to use models and wind tunnels to get data to use for the design. I used to live in the Seattle area in 79 and the model shop was very busy back then.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I remember wheel landing in cubs, champs, chiefs, stinstons, L-4s, L-5s, L-19s, Wacos and etc. God I must be getting really old. Ah a flight in a T-34 would be fun; again.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Randy</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Lets not forget the B52 looks like it is nose down on takeoff.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>WG</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=vanputte@cox.net href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">Ron Van Putte</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=bob@toprudder.com href="mailto:bob@toprudder.com">Bob Richards</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 30, 2005 12:45 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: INCIDENCE settings</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>On Sep 30, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Bob Richards wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>That is a pet peeve of mine as well.<BR> <BR>Remember the Hobie Hawk glider? It flew nose down -- WAY down. It was designed that way. It was not a balance issue at all.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>I do remember the Hobie Hawk and how it flew. <BR><BR>A J-3 Cub on a proper final approach looks nose-down as well, but many pilots won't let it come in that way. As a result, they'll never enjoy a wheel landing on a Cub.<BR><BR>Ron Van Putte<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><B><I>Ron Van Putte <vanputte@cox.net></I></B> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>This discussion also tapped into one of my pet peeves: Guy sees an <BR>airplane flying around with the tail low and announces, "That airplane<BR>is tail heavy". Probably wrong. The incidence relationship between<BR>the wing and the horizontal tail is probably incorrect. The CG has an <BR>effect, but the condition is usually caused by a bad trim setup. Now I <BR>feel better.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>