<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2769" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi Earl,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>
I can really relate what you said and in particular your last comment, "Concerns
really revolve around staying within one's "comfort level" or reaching out for a
challenge with a chance of improvement - be it a pilot or a judge".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>On one hand many of my pattern colleagues, myself
included, can really fly certain maneuvers with great comfort, on the other hand
there are maneuvers that we fly where we have no comfort at all. Some are almost
a crash in the offing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>An example for me is a an 8-point roll. I just love
doing them. Then they asked me to do it from inverted to inverted. Can you spell
increased pucker factor. A second example is judging, I prefer to judge a
schedule that I have flown or attempted to fly. It helps me know what is coming
next and how much time I have to put a score together. Unknowns I find very hard
to get the timing and hence judge.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Which leads me to the issue unknown schedules for
the majority of us. When I flew in a couple of IMAC Nat's I figured out what was
the big difference between Scale and Precision aerobatics, (At least for me).
The words "practiced aerobatics" came up. IMAC only gets a year to fly
their known routines and they do have unknown schedules like their full scale
counterparts. BTW, It could well be said that when I flew in their first
Nat's ALL of the schedules were unknowns to me :-)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>When we fly our schedules we practice and practice
them to the n'th degree. We get comfortable but it does not take much to throw
us off our rhythm. How many times have you heard "I have only flown the routine
left to right etc?". I think that this comfort-zone that we create with practice
is why we often see so much resistance to the change of the schedules, or at
least the content of the new schedules. I have witnessed pretty good pilots try
a new schedule and be terrible. Then a week later they have it memorized and
they can do a very respectable rendition.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This is why I think that unknowns are not such a
good idea for pattern because they undermine the premise of practiced schedules
and the comfort that come with that practice.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><BR>Eric.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>