[F3A-Discussion] F3A Rules proposals

[Earl Haury]

Derek

After discussing with several competitors I support the changes to the noise measurement process. Having been involved with measuring noise on the flight line in 2011 it was obvious that the potential for injury was greater than desired. With very few exceptions, the measured sound level was well below the limits suggesting that per flight measurement was also a huge time consumer that wasn’t necessary. Completing sound measurements during processing makes sense to me.

I believe the proposal should clarify that, presumably, sound measurement isn’t an “important model characteristic” under ABR B.17.13 which calls for testing same for 20% of models during competition. 

Earl

From: Derek Koopowitz via F3A-Discussion 
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 3:16 PM
To: f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us 
Subject: [F3A-Discussion] F3A Rules proposals

Hi everyone, 

I sent out an email on March 13 and never heard anything.  There are a number of rules proposals that will be voted on in April at the CIAM meeting and I'd like feedback on them.

You can view the rules in the attached.  I have supporting documentation that I will send separately to keep the size down.

Any/all feedback would be great to have!

-Derek  


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
F3A-Discussion mailing list
F3A-Discussion at lists.f3a.us
http://lists.f3a.us/mailman/listinfo/f3a-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/f3a-discussion/attachments/20150414/be1a8a2d/attachment-0001.html>