[F3A-Discussion] Finals flights

Atwood, Mark atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
Wed Apr 18 07:00:43 AKDT 2018


Seems that only keeping 2 of 3 really lowers the impact of the Unknowns.  Seems often that the simpler unknown is biasedly won by the perceived favorite… leaving only the difficult unknown (and there’s always one that’s more difficult than the other) to truly separate people.    As a spectator and TM, I’d personally prefer 1 F, and the best 2 of 3 unknowns (so that a single error didn’t eliminate you from the contest) but I realize they’re trying to shorten the finals day and judging workload a little bit.

If the proposal is for 1F and 2 Unknowns, I’d vote to keep all 3.   Curious what the team guys think.

-Mark
MARK ATWOOD
o.  (440) 229-2502
c.  (216) 316-2489
e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>

Paragon Consulting, Inc.
5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
Powering The Digital Experience

On Apr 18, 2018, at 10:53 AM, Derek Koopowitz via F3A-Discussion <f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us<mailto:f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us>> wrote:

Good morning everyone,

There is a potential rules proposal to only fly 1 F and 2 unknowns during the finals of CAT 1 events.  Should we count all 3 flights or the best 2 of 3?

Best,
-Derek
_______________________________________________
F3A-Discussion mailing list
F3A-Discussion at lists.f3a.us<mailto:F3A-Discussion at lists.f3a.us>
http://lists.f3a.us/mailman/listinfo/f3a-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/f3a-discussion/attachments/20180418/9338d5a3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the F3A-Discussion mailing list